Asistencia urgente a los pacientes con hemorragia digestiva alta en los hospitales comarcales catalanes / Emergency care of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in regional hospitals in Catalonia

Objetivo Valorar los recursos disponibles en los hospitales comarcales catalanes para la asistencia urgente de la hemorragia digestiva alta. Método Se analiza una encuesta enviada a 32 hospitales, sobre la existencia, composición y recursos del turno de guardia (TDG) de endoscopia, referida al año 2009.ResultadosRespondieron 24 centros, que cubrían la asistencia de 3.954.000 habitantes. Tenían TDG 12 hospitales. No disponían de TDG en su centro de referencia 1.483.000 habitantes. Los centros con TDG tenían más camas y cubrían más población. Los TDG estaban formados por 4,5 endoscopistas (rango 2-11), que cubrían 82,1 (33,2-182,5) guardias/año. Diecisiete centros reportaban 1.571 episodios (51 por centro, rango 3-280, 39,68/100.000 hab.). Los centros con TDG reportaban más casos (76 vs. 43, p=0,047). Los que no disponen de TDG derivaron más pacientes (147 vs. 17, p= 0,001). Los pacientes en urgencias estaban a cargo de medicina interna en 4 centros, de cirugía en 14 y repartidos entre ambos servicios en 6. Si ingresaban, quedaron a cargo de Digestivo solo en 6 hospitales. Los recursos más utilizados eran la ligadura en la hemorragia varicosa y las terapias de inyección en la no varicosa. Un 21% de centros no realizaban tratamiento combinado. Conclusiones Una proporción significativa de la población no dispone de endoscopista de guardia en su centro de referencia. La constitución de TDG en hospitales comarcales supone importantes cargas asistenciales. La coordinación entre profesionales y centros permitiría la aplicación eficiente de los recursos terapéuticos y el establecimiento de TDG en centros que no tienen (AU)

Objective To evaluate the resources available in Catalan regional hospitals for the emergency care of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Methods We analyzed a survey sent to 32 hospitals on the availability, composition and resources of a duty endoscopy service for the year 2009.ResultsResponses were obtained from 24 centers, covering 3,954,000 inhabitants. Duty endoscopists were available in 12 hospitals. A total of 1,483,000 inhabitants were unable to access a duty endoscopist in the referral center. Centers with duty endoscopists had more beds and had a larger catchment area. Duty services were composed of 4.5 endoscopists (range 2-11), covering 82.1 (33.2-182.5) duty shifts/year. Seventeen centers reported 1,571 episodes (51%, range: 3-280, 39.68/100,000 inhabitants). Centers with a duty service reported a greater number of cases (76 vs. 43, p=0.047). Centers without this service referred a greater number of patients (147 vs. 17, p=0.001). Patients in the emergency department were under the care of the internal medicine department in four centers, the surgery department in 14 centers and under the care of both departments in six. Admitted patients were under the care of the gastroenterology department in only six hospitals. The most widely used procedures were ligation of varicose bleeding and injection therapies in non-varicose bleeding. Twenty-one percent of centers did not perform combined treatment. Conclusions A significant proportion of the population does not have access to a duty endoscopist in referral centers. Duty shifts represent significant workload in regional hospitals. Coordination among health professionals and centers would allow the efficient application of therapeutic resources and a duty endoscopy service to be established in centers lacking this resource (AU)

[Emergency care of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in regional hospitals in Catalonia]. / Asistencia urgente a los pacientes con hemorragia digestiva alta en los hospitales comarcales catalanes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the resources available in Catalan regional hospitals for the emergency care of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. METHODS: We analyzed a survey sent to 32 hospitals on the availability, composition and resources of a duty endoscopy service for the year 2009. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 24 centers, covering 3,954,000 inhabitants. Duty endoscopists were available in 12 hospitals. A total of 1,483,000 inhabitants were unable to access a duty endoscopist in the referral center. Centers with duty endoscopists had more beds and had a larger catchment area. Duty services were composed of 4.5 endoscopists (range 2-11), covering 82.1 (33.2-182.5) duty shifts/year. Seventeen centers reported 1,571 episodes (51%, range: 3-280, 39.68/100,000 inhabitants). Centers with a duty service reported a greater number of cases (76 vs. 43, p=0.047). Centers without this service referred a greater number of patients (147 vs. 17, p=0.001). Patients in the emergency department were under the care of the internal medicine department in four centers, the surgery department in 14 centers and under the care of both departments in six. Admitted patients were under the care of the gastroenterology department in only six hospitals. The most widely used procedures were ligation of varicose bleeding and injection therapies in non-varicose bleeding. Twenty-one percent of centers did not perform combined treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of the population does not have access to a duty endoscopist in referral centers. Duty shifts represent significant workload in regional hospitals. Coordination among health professionals and centers would allow the efficient application of therapeutic resources and a duty endoscopy service to be established in centers lacking this resource.